ciao ragazzi, ho ultimato la traduzione dei titoli e vorrei inviare domanda per la GBR.
mi servirebbe però un Solicitor a Roma per l'autenticazione delle traduzioni.
Non capisco per quale motivo insistono tutti con volermi rifare le traduzioni da capo, cosa che ovviamente costa una marea di soldi e che non ho nessuna intenzione di fare, visto che ho fatto le traduzioni con il mio insegnante di inglese che è madrelingua.
Qualcuno di voi può dirmi come ha fatto ad ottenere l'autenticazione delle traduzioni? devo cercarmi un notaio o cosa?
se avete qualche contatto di traduttori ufficiali o Solicitor che qui a Roma autenticano le traduzioni (basta una firma e un timbro -.-' ) potreste inviarmeli tramite messaggio privato?
potrei fare tutto da sola tramite giuramento in tribunale?
TRIBUNALE ORDINARIO DI ROMA- Ufficio Atti Notori Perizie e Traduzioni
grazie in anticipo
ps.
dal sito HPC ho trovato questo
STANDARDS OF PROFICIENCY
threshold level of qualification for entry to the Register
credo che comunque per capirci qualcosa in più bisognerà aspettare il 1 luglio...sperando che aggiornino la sezione 'international'
"...Once the Register is opened, we can accept applications via the international route."
In particolare, negli Standards of proficiency ho un dubbio rispetto ai precedenti moduli che dichiaravano che, in quanto cittadini facene parte della EEA, non dovevamo dimostrare la conoscenza della lingua. non riesco bene a capire se è ancora così oppure no.
"
English language proficiency and language testing
The PLG also discussed the English language requirements for entry to the
applied psychologists part of the Register.
We consider applications for registration from individuals who have trained
outside of the UK via our international process.
Under European legislation, applications from applicants with ‘mutual recognition’rights are treated differently to those from applicants from outside of the European Economic Area (EEA).
In order to obtain mutual recognition rights, an applicant has to be a national of a country within the EEA and have the right to practise in an EEA country. We assess the applications of such applicants in the same way as other applications.
However, if we find that there is a shortfall between the applicant’s education and experience and the standards required for registration, we are able to ask them to undertake a ‘period of adaptation’ to make up this shortfall. A period of adaptation is a period of supervised practice and/or academic training which allows an EEA applicant to reach the standard required to be registered with us.
Under the legislation,
we are unable to require EEA applicants exercising mutual recognition rights
to undergo a language test (except for applicants for speech and language therapy, please see below). Additionally, HPC is unable to language test other applicants for whom English is their first language.
However, we are able to require evidence of language proficiency from
international applicants who
do not have mutual recognition rights under European Legislation and for whom English is not their first language.
We currently require applicants to achieve an overall score in the academic test of the
International Language Testing System (IELTS) of at least 7.0, with no element below 6.5. A number of other tests are also approved at levels equivalent to the IELTS. A minimum overall IELTS score of 7.0 is the current requirement for pharmacists, doctors, dentists and nurses.
Our requirements, however, are higher for speech and language therapists, for whom higher language proficiency is a core professional skill. For this profession a score of level 8, with no element below 7.5 is required. The rationale behind this is that speech and language therapists, as a threshold requirement, need to have an understanding of, and be able to use, the phonetic and linguistic structure of language. As this proficiency is a core professional skill for speech and language therapists, the Council is able to require both EEA and non-EEA applicants to undergo this test.
The PLG discussed whether there was a case for some disciplines of applied
psychology to have a requirement equal to that of speech and language
therapists.
Some members of the group argued that, whilst it may not be necessary for all disciplines, that there was a case for this level in
clinical, counselling and educational psychology. It was argued that in these disciplines language was the primary tool of intervention and a complex understanding of the nuances of language was essential. However, other members of the group questioned whether there was a justification for the requirements for these disciplines to be higher than that for other professionals whose work is carried out through language.
We make no recommendations about the IELTS level in this consultation document. Instead, we would welcome the views of our stakeholders on an appropriate level for applied psychologists."
in pratica se ho ben capito stanno ancora decidendo di che morte dobbiamo morire...
(la tassa di scrutinio però rimane sempre 420£...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)